The India tectonic plate moving north at about 45mm a year is pushing under the Eurasian plate beneath the Himalayas.

Two tectonic plates meet beneath the Himalayas along a fault line. The India plate is moving north at around 45mm a year and pushing under the Eurasian plate. Over time that is how the Himalayas were created.
Dr Brian Baptie, head of seismology at the British Geological Survey in Edinburgh, explains the potential after-effects of the quake.

Saturday's catastrophic earthquake in Nepal occurred because of two converging tectonic plates: the India plate and the overriding Eurasia plate to the north, the U.S. Geological Survey said.

Tectonic plates are the large, thin, relatively rigid plates that move relative to one another on the outer surface of the Earth.

Nepal earthquake map

Plates are always slowly moving, but they get stuck at their edges due to friction. When the stress on the edge overcomes the friction, there is an earthquake that releases energy in waves that travel through the Earth's crust and cause the shaking that we feel.

At the location of Saturday's earthquake, about 50 miles to the northeast of the Nepalese capital of Kathmandu, the India plate is converging with Eurasia at a rate of about 2 inches per year toward the north-northeast, driving the uplift of the Himalayan mountain range.

The quake had a depth of only 7 miles, which is considered shallow in geological terms, the Associated Press reported. The shallower the quake, the more destructive power it carries.

The earthquake was felt as far away as Lahore in Pakistan, which is more than 700 miles away. It was also felt 380 miles away in Lhasa in Tibet, and 400 miles away in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Although a major plate boundary with a history of large- to great-sized earthquakes, large quakes in this area are rare in the documented historical era, the U.S. Geological Survey reports. Over the past century, just four events of magnitude-6.0 or larger have occurred within about 150 miles of Saturday's earthquake.

One, a magnitude-6.9 earthquake in August 1988 about 150 miles to the southeast of Saturday's quake, caused nearly 1,500 fatalities, USGS said.

The largest event, a magnitude-8.0 quake known as the 1934 Nepal-Bihar earthquake, occurred in a similar location to the 1988 quake. It severely damaged Kathmandu, and is thought to have caused around 10,600 deaths.

Only about 15 earthquakes a year in the world — out of 1.3 million total temblors — are magnitude-7.0 or higher, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The devastating earthquake and resulting tsunami that hit parts of Japan in 2011, killing thousands of people, was magnitude-9.0.

An earthquake's power increases by 10 times with each increase in the number of its scale. This means Saturday's earthquake — the same magnitude as the one that hit San Francisco in 1906 — was 22 times more powerful than the 7.0 quake that devastated Haiti in 2010.
Source: 1, 2, 3

Post a Comment

John Hodge said... April 26, 2015 at 7:35 PM

"An earthquake's power increases by 10 times with each increase in the number of its scale. This means Saturday's earthquake — the same magnitude as the one that hit San Francisco in 1906 — was 22 times more powerful than the 7.0 quake that devastated Haiti in 2010."

Something doesn't sound right here. The earthquake in Nepal, I've heard, was a 7.8 on the Moment Magnitude scale, as was the 1906 San Francisco earthquake (according to Wikipdedia), so that parts sound right. And the Haitian earthquake was a 7.0 on the same scale (again according to Wikipedia). But that's a 0.8 difference on the MM scale, which, by the author's own description, would seem to mean the power of the 7.8 events were less than ten times that of the Haitian event, not 22 times.

Since this is a geology page, it'd be nice to include what is meant by an earthquake's "power". Is it the amount of ground motion? Is it the energy released? As I understand it, the amount of energy released goes up by a factor of 30 for each whole number increase in the MM scale, and that would make the "22 times more powerful" statement sensical; but that conflicts with what the author said about an earthquakes "power".

A little bit more explanation would be nice.

Mark Vanstone said... April 29, 2015 at 12:00 AM

For further clarification of the Moment Magnitude scale, the reader may like to refer to the article at: http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/intensity.html. In the third paragraph, "Magnitudes are based on a logarithmic scale (base 10). What this means is that for each whole number you go up on the magnitude scale, the amplitude of the ground motion recorded by a seismograph goes up ten times. Using this scale, a magnitude 5 earthquake would result in ten times the level of ground shaking as a magnitude 4 earthquake (and 32 times as much energy would be released)."

Cindy Dy said... February 26, 2016 at 11:50 AM

I enjoy most of your articles,the articles are so nice for readers.


patanjali yogpeeth nepal said... April 22, 2016 at 1:36 PM

Patanjali Yog Peeth Nepal gives his administrations to nepal earthquake. Patanjali Yog Peeth Nepal constantly prepared to giving help in that circumstances with no troubles. For More Information Visit My Site:- nepal earthquake

patanjali rahat kosh said... May 3, 2016 at 12:25 PM

Nepal Earth Quake is a huge shocked for all the Nepal People and other as well because that will make a lots of losses of life and other things. Patanjali Rahat Kosh taking a step for Nepal Tragedy. For more information Please visit site:-
nepal tragedy

Frederick Guyton said... April 5, 2017 at 11:59 AM

It's a global issue! Every corner of the planet may become a hotbed for earthquakes. A strong and earthquake is the hugest problem that must be solved at a global level: http://bigessaywriter.com/blog/earthquake-essay-human-lives-cant-be-rebuilt